AI Visibility Snapshot
Get my snapshot — $19

What AI recommends for video conferencing software

Across 35 live answers recorded on August 20, 2026, the video conferencing software most often recommended by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok were Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom. The five engines named 32 distinct brands between them, and all five agreed on 5 of the top 20. The rest of the field depends on which engine a buyer happens to ask.

Original measurement · 35 live answers across 5 engines · Recorded

The leaderboard

Ranked by how many of the 35 answers named each brand. Average position is where the brand appeared in the list the engine gave — 1.0 means it was named first every time it came up.

#BrandAnswers naming itEnginesAvg positionSentiment
1Microsoft Teams25 of 355 of 52.5positive
2Google Meet25 of 355 of 52.5positive
3Zoom24 of 355 of 51.3positive
4Cisco Webex13 of 355 of 54.2positive
5Jitsi Meet10 of 355 of 55.7positive
6RingCentral Video5 of 353 of 55.4positive
7Discord5 of 354 of 56.2positive
8Slack Huddles4 of 353 of 55.0positive
9GoTo Meeting4 of 353 of 56.0positive
10Google Workspace3 of 353 of 56.0neutral
11Webex2 of 351 of 54.0positive
12Dialpad2 of 352 of 55.0positive
13Slack2 of 352 of 55.0neutral
14RingCentral2 of 352 of 56.0positive
15Zoho Meeting2 of 352 of 56.5positive
16Whereby2 of 352 of 57.5positive
17Nextiva2 of 352 of 58.5positive
18Zoom Workplace1 of 351 of 52.0positive
19Google/Gmail1 of 351 of 52.0positive
20Google Calendar1 of 351 of 53.0positive

Where the engines agree, and where they do not

All five engines named Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet. Those are the defaults in this category — the brands an AI answer reaches for regardless of which model a buyer happens to be using.

Across all measured categories the pattern is consistent: the leader is agreed on, the rest is not. The pooled study puts numbers on it.

By contrast, Webex, Zoom Workplace, Google/Gmail, Google Calendar came up on one engine only. A brand in that position is invisible to four out of five buyers who ask an AI, while looking perfectly healthy to anyone checking the one engine that knows it.

EngineNamed most often
ChatGPTMicrosoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet
ClaudeMicrosoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet
GeminiMicrosoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet
PerplexityMicrosoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet
GrokMicrosoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom, Cisco Webex, Jitsi Meet

What this means if you sell video conferencing software

Being absent from this table does not mean the engines dislike you. It usually means they have nothing to reach for: no comparison pages, no presence on the review and listicle sites they cite, no clear statement of who the product is for. The generative engine optimization guide covers what actually shifts this, and the audit process covers how to run the measurement yourself.

Note also what this page cannot tell you. It measures the category, not you. It does not include the brand-level prompts that reveal what an engine says when someone asks about your product by name, it carries no share-of-voice figure for your brand, and it does not list the domains AI cites when answering questions in this category. A $19 snapshot adds all three for one brand.

The prompts behind this page

Every category page uses the same seven prompts, each sent to all five engines:

  1. What are the best video conferencing software right now? List the top options.
  2. Which video conferencing software would you recommend for a small business, and why?
  3. Compare the leading video conferencing software options — who stands out?
  4. What is the best free or affordable video conferencing software?
  5. What video conferencing software do you recommend for a larger company / enterprise?
  6. What are the most popular video conferencing software people are switching to?
  7. I'm choosing a video conferencing software. Give me a shortlist of 5 with one-line pros and cons.

Language models are stochastic, so a rerun on another day will not reproduce this table exactly. That is a property of the medium rather than a flaw in the measurement, and it is one reason to distrust any AI visibility score quoted to one decimal place. The methodology page sets out the limitations in full.

Other categories measured